Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Benefield v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 3:2015cv01122
Plaintiff:
William D. Benefield
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners and Humprey's Co. Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James C. Austin v. Fredreck Schilling
as 15-7445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDRECK SCHILLING, MD/Head Medical Director, HAPPY SMITH, Doctor, ELLA DAVIDSON, Registered Nurse and others
Ferguson v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2015cv01467
Plaintiff:
Drago Kuelh Ferguson
Defendant:
State of Alabama and A.J. Benefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benefield v. Humphrey's Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2015cv00822
Plaintiff:
William D. Benefield
Defendant:
Humphrey's Co. Sheriff Dept. and Southern Health Partner's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Benefield et al
as 1:2015cv05948
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryant
Defendant:
Debra Benefield, Brown, Thomas J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manson v. Turner et al
as 1:2015cv00541
Plaintiff:
Marlon A. Manson
Defendant:
Danny Turner, Kevin Turley, Josh Hardeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Superior Court Clayton County et al
as 1:2014cv03404
Petitioner:
Eli Malik-Jamil Bey
Respondent:
Superior Court Clayton County and Deborah C. Benefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Willin v. Brown County et al
as 6:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brian Bernard Willin
Defendant:
Brown County Sheriff's Department, Bobby Grubbs, Jason Benefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Benefield v. Brad Perritt
as 14-6701
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES E. BENEFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent
Dodson v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2014cv00393
Plaintiff:
Dennis D Dodson
Defendant:
Menard Correctional Center, C/O Barfield and C/O Benefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
