Cases 31 - 40 of 227
Earl Belcher v. Jason Pickett
as 22-55258
Petitioner / Appellant:
EARL MONROE BELCHER
Respondent / Appellee:
JASON PICKETT, Warden
Daniel Skaggs v. Jamie Belcher, et al
as 22-1388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL SKAGGS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMIE BELCHER, SCOTT FLANNERY, Sergeant, MACON COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
Belcher v. Comal County Jail
as 6:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
John Dwain Belcher
Defendant:
Comal County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belcher v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
John Dwain Belcher
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belcher v. Reynolds
as 5:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
John Dwain Belcher
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belcher v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00482
Plaintiff:
Camron Belcher
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt, Warden Jay Christionsen, Deputy Warden Timothy Mcay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher v. Siever et al
as 2:2021cv00588
Plaintiff:
V. Belcher
Defendant:
Travis Siever, Ivan Gilmore and Mr. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00393
Plaintiff:
Camron D Belcher
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Timothy Mcay, Tyler Nickodemus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00529
Plaintiff:
Rhonda S. Belcher
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belcher v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2021cv01080
Plaintiff:
Natasha Yvette Belcher and Sri Roshi El Bey
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department, City of Milwaukee Police Department #6, County Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
