Cases 31 - 40 of 954
Goodwin v. Dinwiddie Court et al
as 3:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Goodwin
Defendant:
Dinwiddie Court, Mrs. Bradshaw, Ms. Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince v. Palm Beach Sheriff Office et al
as 9:2023cv81527
Plaintiff:
Zachary Prince
Defendant:
Palm Beach Sheriff Office, Ric L. Bradshaw, Tara Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Gibbs v. Mckay et al
as 9:2023cv81511
Plaintiff:
Jacob Gibbs
Defendant:
Rodney Mckay, Elizer Ramos, Joseph Milone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Owens v. Scott et al
as 3:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
James Owens
Defendant:
. Scott, . Bradshaw, . Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Bradshaw
as 9:2023cv81445
Plaintiff:
Jacob Gibbs
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Ramirez v. Aguilar et al
as 1:2023cv01538
Petitioner:
Narciso Ramirez
Respondent:
Mark S. Aguilar, Judge David Wolf, Judge Eric Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibbs v. Mitchell et al
as 9:2023cv81430
Plaintiff:
Jacob Gibbs
Defendant:
Mary Mitchell, Tamara Starks, Stephanie Peskowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Kinley v. Margaret Bradshaw
as 23-3847
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN A. KINLEY and JUAN ANTONIO LAMAR KINLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Searcy v. Mr. Macintire et al
as 4:2023cv03731
Plaintiff:
Bradley Searcy
Defendant:
Mr. Macintire and Mr. Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
