Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 262
Ward v. Martin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv00156
Plaintiff: Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant: Anthony D. Martin and Brian Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Channing Scott v. Wendy Davis
as 23-1618
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHANNING L. SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee: WENDY DAVIS
Chan v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv00543
Petitioner: Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent: No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00064
Plaintiff: Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant: Wendy Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff: Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Anupa et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01078
Plaintiff: Matthew Thomas Johnson
Defendant: George Anupa and Bruce Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobo Chan v. Orange County et al
as 8:2023cv00178
Plaintiff: Jacobo Chan
Defendant: Orange County, Orange County Health Care Agency, Don Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Martin et al
as 1:2023cv00289
Plaintiff: Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant: Anthony D. Martin and Brian Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGraw v. Jordan
as 0:2023cv00015
Petitioner: Austin Channing McGraw
Respondent: Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chan v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv00141
Plaintiff: Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?