Cases 31 - 40 of 243
Erwin v. USA
as 22-40184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bonnie Burnette Erwin
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Michael Horowitz, Jeff Baney and others
Burnside v. Kientzle et al
as 1:2022cv01126
Plaintiff:
Brian A Burnside
Defendant:
Brandon Kientzle, Jeffrey Hinshaw, Terry Muench and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young Song v. Tony Parker, et al
as 22-5199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YOUNG BOK SONG
Defendant / Appellee:
TDOC COMMISSIONER TONY PARKER, in his individual and official capacity, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER LEE DOTSON, in his individual and official capacity, CORECIVIC CEO DAMON HINIGER, in his individual and official capacity and others
LEWIS v. MAYOR(S) OF WASHINGTON, DC
as 1:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant:
MAYOR(S) OF WASHINGTON, DC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. DC JAIL
as 1:2021cv03090
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
DC JAIL and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coll v. Alamia et al
as 1:2021cv03712
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Coll
Defendant:
Hank Alamia, CO Thomas, CO Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONROE-RICKS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR D.C. et al
as 1:2021cv03061
Petitioner:
VICKY MONROE-RICKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR D.C. and DC SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRAXTON v. HAIRSTON et al
as 1:2021cv03020
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
RUSSELL HAIRSTON, KRISTIN MCGOUGH, DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reado v. White House et al
as 4:2021cv03232
Plaintiff:
Tyrone David Reado
Defendant:
White House, Government, Washington DC and Joe Cunenham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Cotton et al
as 4:2021cv03062
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Brianna Husmann, Judge Duane Dougherty and others
Plaintiff:
Frankie Levi Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
