Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Walton v. Corizon Health Services et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00713
Defendant:
Nurse Guice, Corizon Health Services and Nurse Dregers
Plaintiff:
Dia Armon Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2019cv00646
Defendant:
Cartagena, Jane Reed, Aramark and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Karl A Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dias v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00035
Petitioner:
Steve Dias
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gutires Dias v. United States of America
as 0:2018cv61997
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jose Gutires Dias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Antonetti v. Cox et al
as 3:2018cv00067
Defendant:
C.C. Adams, R. Aranas, Avendano and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01260
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01258
Plaintiff:
Tuan C. Fields, Sr.
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01259
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Elias Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Caterbone, et al v. President United States of Ame, et al
as 17-3400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, NSA, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY, DARPA and others
Blaney v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Blaney
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
