Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 36,618
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22146
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Charles Jordan v. J. Barves, et al
as 24-2030
Plaintiff: CHARLES JEROME JORDAN
Defendant: J. BARVES, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, J. PUMPHREY, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, LT. BARDO and others
Farrow v. People of the State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1239
Petitioner: MICHAEL FARROW
Respondent: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CDOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Scaife v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1240
Petitioner: VERYL B. SCAIFE
Respondent: TERRY JACQUES, Warden, ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, CDOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Jones v. Director Department Corrections
as 1:2024cv00976
Petitioner: Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Respondent: Director Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ryan Turner v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6323
Petitioner: RYAN MARTEZ TURNER
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00946
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Hicks v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff: Sean Hicks
Defendant: Bryan Collier, Unknown makers and seller of TDCJ's Algorythym computer, Unknown implementors of the unknown algorythym computor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sosa v. Lumpkin
as 24-10482
Petitioner: Thomas C. Sosa, Jr.
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?