Cases 31 - 40 of 162
Taylor v. Army - Banks: Components
as 1:2016cv08524
Plaintiff:
Eric Taylor
Defendant:
Army - Banks: Components
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. USA-Delta Satanizm-Q+A
as 1:2016cv07923
Plaintiff:
Eric Taylor
Defendant:
USA-Delta Satanizm-Q+A
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2016cv06822
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL, ERIC TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv06240
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. WALLS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL, ERIC TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. All Local divisions et al
as 1:2016cv07614
Plaintiff:
Eric Taylor
Defendant:
All Local divisions, Connecticut Officials, Component Staff of Internet Techs. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neptune v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04815
Plaintiff:
Ralph M. Neptune
Defendant:
The City of New York, Department of Correctional Facility Department, The New York State Department of Parole Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neptune v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03700
Plaintiff:
Ralph M. Neptune
Defendant:
The City of New York, Department of Correctional Facility, The New York State Department of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Loftin et al
as 5:2015cv02688
Defendant:
Gary Loftin, Dale Cox, Assistant District Attorneys and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. USA
as 4:2015cv00014
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Eric Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Randy Williamson v. Danzy
as 14-6766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY LEE WILLIAMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DANZY, Assistant Warden/UNICOR S.O. I., SWAN, UNICOR Supervising Officer and ERIC TAYLOR, Institution Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
