Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Norris v. Blanton et al
as 6:2010cv00217
Plaintiff:
Garron L Norris
Defendant:
Bill Blanton, Joel Hill, Harold Crocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dowdle et al v. Blanton et al
as 6:2010cv00159
Plaintiff:
John Ray Dowdle and Garron L Norris
Defendant:
Bill Blanton, Joel Hill, Harold Crocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Norris v Singletary, et al
as 8:2009cv03339
Plaintiff:
Garron L Norris
Defendant:
Julia Singletary and Harold Cracker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bethel v. Patterson et al
as 1:2009cv01056
Plaintiff:
Garron Van Bethel
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norris v. Mann et al
as 8:2009cv02577
Plaintiff:
Garron Ladon Norris
Defendant:
Ofc Mann and Ofc Lemmonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Garron Davis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-10933
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARRON PAUL DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Norris v. Queen et al
as 8:2009cv02346
Plaintiff:
Garron Ladon Norris
Defendant:
M Queen and Cpl Huggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Norris v. Lewis et al
as 8:2009cv02291
Plaintiff:
Garron Ladon Norris
Defendant:
Margrett Lewis, Kenny Brown and Barbara Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Norris v. Blanton et al
as 8:2009cv00852
Plaintiff:
Garron Ladon Norris
Defendant:
Bill Blanton, Joel Hill, Harold Crocker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00510
Petitioner:
Garron Paul Davis
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
