Cases 31 - 40 of 722
(PC) Bennett v. Newsom et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Hambun, Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sykes v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Troy Sykes
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Scott Macomber and Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Foster v. Newsome
as 2:2023cv02896
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Foster
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinson et al v. Pinellas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
Anthony Geno Martinson, Eric J. Wilson, Jeffrey A. Dieisher and others
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff's Office and Sheriff Bob Gualtieri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yepa v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00547
Petitioner:
Gavin Yepa
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Khademi v. Newsome et al
as 2:2023cv02743
Plaintiff:
Davood Khademi
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, City Council and Immigration Naturalization, Services (INS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Hill v. Governor Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2023cv09670
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hill
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, State of California, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Hutson et al
as 2:2023cv06857
Plaintiff:
Kenshawn G King and Kenshawn Gavin King
Defendant:
Susan Hutson and Deshawn Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braden v. Benton et al
as 3:2023cv03588
Plaintiff:
Travis Wade Braden
Defendant:
City of Benton, David Bartoni, Anthony Skobel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03277
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, CENTURY REGIONAL DET FACILITY, ANGELA D. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
