Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Jacori Carter v. James Park
as 15-6093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACORI ANDRE CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES PARKS, Director of Offender Management Services
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARKE, WARDEN DAVIS, JOYCETINE BOONE, Assistant Warden and others
Chauncey Williams v. James E. Park
as 14-7855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES PARKS, Manager Offender SRV., M. VARGO, Warden; Sussex II and JORDAN, Mental Health; Senior
Darrell Parks v. K. Struab, et al
as 14-6274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. STRUAB, Correctional Counselor/Acting Lieutenant, JOHN DOE, Sued as "Unknown Lieutenant", MOULTON, Unit Manager and others
Johnson v. Montalbano et al
as 3:2014cv00570
Plaintiff:
Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Linda Montalbano, Thomas Redman and James Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Park v. Coakley et al
as 4:2014cv01537
Plaintiff:
James Park
Defendant:
Joe Coakley, R. Hanson and Jose A Santana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Parks v. A. Jordan
as 14-1403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. JORDAN, Discipline Hearing Officer
Parks v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv03090
Petitioner:
Darrell James Parks
Respondent:
J. L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Darrell Parks v. Andrew Edinger, et al
as 13-3247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW EDINGER, Medical Doctor, KEVIN PIGOS, Medical Director Doctor, FRANCIS FASCIANA, Mid Level Practitioner and others
Bradley Maxwell v. Harold Clarke
as 13-7056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY MAXWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, JAMES PARKS, GEORGE HINKLE and others
Darrell Parks v. Wren, et al
as 13-55905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
WREN, Mailroom Supervisor, TOM BRODY, RENE GALAZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
