Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00978
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ward et al v. Stewart et al
as 4:2011cv00432
Plaintiff:
Jammie Ray Lynn Ward and Mark G Mateer
Defendant:
Stewart, Douglas and Montgermy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jova v. Smith
as 11-1822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jesus Jova and Tyheem Keesh, FKA Tyheem Allah
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph T. Smith, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Evan Gorelick, Deputy Superintendent of Programs, Shawngunk Correctional Facility, Glen S. Goord, Commissioner of DOCS and others
Forsyth v. Taylor et al
as 1:2011cv01164
Plaintiff:
Robert J Forsyth, II
Defendant:
Gladyse C Taylor, Jesse White, Sherry Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade Knight v. Jonathan Kaminski, et al
as 10-3999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE KNIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN KAMINSKI, TROY WILLIAMSON, GEORGE C. NYE, III and others
Thompson v. Taller et al
as 1:2010cv01213
Plaintiff:
Stanton J Thompson
Defendant:
Steven Taller, Guth, . Gish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Mahone et al
as 1:2010cv01207
Plaintiff:
Stanton J Thompson
Defendant:
Slyvia Mahone, H Hamilton, Doug Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Reed et al
as 1:2010cv01182
Plaintiff:
Stanton J Thompson
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, D Brown, M McNabb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Silleman et al
as 1:2009cv00886
Plaintiff:
Mark G. Wells
Defendant:
Jason Silleman, Donna Snell, Susan Hrovat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2008cv01510
Plaintiff:
Shane D. Willis
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Marion County Public Defender Office, Sara Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
