Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Morrissey v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv11386
Defendant:
Superintendent Steven J. O'Brien, Pat Doe 1-4, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Plaintiff:
John Morrissey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Nalty v. United States et al
as 1:2018cv01339
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
United States, United States Army, Judicial Branch of US Gov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalty et al v. Compass Group, TLC. et al
as 1:2018cv01295
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
Compass Group, TLC., Nelson Silva, Trinity Services Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullough v. Pearlman et al
as 8:2018cv00194
Defendant:
Nicole R. Hutter, Darin Morrissey, Benjamin Gerard Pearlman and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace R. McCullough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hugal v. Norfolk Superior Court et al
as 1:2018cv10427
Petitioner:
Joseph C. Hugal
Respondent:
Norfolk Superior Court and Michael W. Morrissey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalty v. Krieger et al
as 1:2017cv02205
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
Marcia Smith Krieger, R. Brooke Jackson, Christine M. Arguello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enoch Dinkens, Jr. v. Brian Morrissey
as 17-12795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENOCH E. DINKENS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN D. MORRISSEY
Adams et al v. Morrissey et al
as 1:2017cv11059
Plaintiff:
Brianna J. Adams, Patricia U. Adams, Blenda A. Rice and others
Defendant:
Michael W. Morrissey, Edward J Doherty, Michael Kasprzak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dinkens v. Morrissey
as 3:2017cv00549
Plaintiff:
Enoch Eugene Dinkens, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian D. Morrissey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
