Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Williams v. Austin et al
as 6:2015cv00828
Plaintiff:
Alex Leonard Williams
Defendant:
Luke Austin and Officer Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Dion Mario Neal
Defendant:
Lt. Calloway, Officer Wilson, Officer Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Rice v. Daymon Byrd
as 15-6288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAYMON BYRD, Senior Officer, OFFICER HIGHLANDER, OFFICER QUINN and others
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICER SINGLETON and others
Williams v. Austin et al
as 6:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
Alex Leonard Williams
Defendant:
Luke Austin and Officer Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Rice v. U.S.
as 13-7444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAYMON BYRD, Senior Officer and others
SIMPSON v. LT. M. JAMES et al
as 3:2013cv05199
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES SIMPSON
Defendant:
LT. M. JAMES, SGT. HOPKINS, OFFICER ARRIGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joassin v. Lieutenant Murphy et al
as 3:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Jean Joassin
Defendant:
Lieutenant Murphy, Sergeant Rodgers, Officer Coats and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lasenby v. Cook County et al
as 1:2013cv03229
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Lasenby
Defendant:
Cook County, Tom Dart, Scott Kurtovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel L Shoemake v. B M Cash et al
as 2:2012cv00334
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Bell, B M Cash, Correctional Officer Chambers and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel L Shoemake
Hampton v. Williams et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2011cv00967
Plaintiff:
Darius Montez Hampton
Defendant:
Officer Williams and Officer Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
