Cases 31 - 40 of 493
Greene v. Douglas et al
as 2:2022cv12626
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Greene
Defendant:
Douglas, M. Godfrey, C. Walker and others
(PC) Hill v. Qui
as 2:2022cv01821
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Suzi Qui, N. R. Smith, Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY SPENCER
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahueron v. Miller et al
as 2:2022cv01550
Plaintiff:
Allieanna Charleyn Mahueron
Defendant:
J. Miller, Lt. Kenyon, Lt. Russel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Qui
as 4:2022cv05820
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Suzi Qui, N. R. Smith, Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Worthy v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Bruce E. Worthy, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew R. Smith, Unknown Rivera, Uknown Kosiorowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. THE PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv01382
Plaintiff:
Dashaan R. Smith
Defendant:
The PA Department of Corrections, Superintendent T. Mcginley, LT. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. MCKINNEY et al
as 2:2022cv02983
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R SMITH
Defendant:
STEPHEN S. MCKINNEY, DANIEL J. STICKNEY JR., FRANCIS D. PETERSON JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 5:2022cv00374
Petitioner:
Patrick R. Smith
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McBride v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02929
Plaintiff:
Sidney McBride, III
Defendant:
Brandon R Smith, Trent Duplantis and Lafourche Parish Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
