Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,853
Blount v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff: Carl Blount
Defendant: Ron Neal, Pamela Bane and Mark Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. DeSantis et al
as 3:2024cv00369
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Cole
Defendant: Ron DeSantis, City of Jacksonville, Patrick Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feldpausch v. Rabdia et al
as 3:2024cv03088
Plaintiff: Ron Feldpausch
Defendant: . Rabdia, Wexford Medical, . Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff: Anthony Deundra Wilson
Defendant: Warden Unknown Jackson, Security Warden Unknown Andrews, Chief Unknown Perry and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wintrode v. Carter et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff: Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant: Tom Carter, Chris Hogan, Randall Buffalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00594
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Andre Payne v. Ron Neal
as 24-1562
Petitioner: ANDRE D. PAYNE
Respondent: RON NEAL
Wilburn v. Reagle et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff: Anthony Tyrell Wilburn and Anthony T Wilburn
Defendant: Christina Reagle, Ron Neal, David Liebel and others
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv01686
Plaintiff: Roy Lee Wade
Defendant: State of South Carolina, Department of Mental Health, Kelly Gothard and others
Respondent: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Emery v. Ron Neal
as 24-1533
Plaintiff: FRANK W. EMERY
Defendant: RON NEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?