Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Frederick Banks v. S. O.
as 14-1218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. O., M. O., DIRECTOR CIA and others
Debtor - Appellee:
M. O.
Banks v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv03084
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. O., M. O., Director Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferguson v. Prator et al
as 5:2012cv00942
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ferguson
Defendant:
Steve Prator, T Dickey, Medical Administration Caddo Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel Cortez v. Matthew Cates, et al
as 11-17507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL RUDY CORTEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATES, Esquire, RICHARD J. KIRKLAND, ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden and others
Gavaldon v. Cate et al
as 4:2011cv02887
Plaintiff:
David Gavaldon
Defendant:
Mathew L. Cate, George V. Giurbino, Derral G. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asberry v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
Mokuba Y. Asberry
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Linda Osborne, Danny Blaylock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Clinton v. R. Arbini, et al
as 10-55678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS CLINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
R. ARBINI, Correctional Counselor I, R. DELACRUZ, Correctional Counselor I, D. ENGLER, Correctional Counselor II and others
Taylor v. D. C. S. O. et al
as 3:2010cv00421
Plaintiff:
Jaquis L. Taylor
Defendant:
D. C. S. O. and Hill Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juan Enriquez v. W. Estelle, et al
as 10-20210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN ENRIQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
W J ESTELLE, Director Texas Department of Corrections, LESTER H BEAIRD, Warden Darrington Unit, Rosharon, TX, CHARLES AVERY, JR. and others
Cortez v. Cate et al
as 5:2009cv03021
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rudy Cortez
Defendant:
Mathew L. Cate, Richard J. Kirkland, Robert A. Horel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
