Cases 31 - 40 of 596
CHURCH v. TUBBS et al
as 1:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
BILLY J. CHURCH
Defendant:
OFFICER TUBBS, OFFICER LOWERY and MS. SEALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Washington Parish Jail et al
as 2:2022cv02512
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Norman
Defendant:
Washington Parish Jail, Randy Seal, Juani Bautista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarell Terry v. James Dycus, et al
as 22-2396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jarell Davis Terry
Defendant:
James Dycus, Warden, ADC, Danny Norment, Sgt., ADC, Morieon Kelly, Sgt., ADC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Sykes, Sergeant and John Munn
Peters v. Hittner
as 22-20235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters and Sealed Juvenile
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge David Hittner and State of Texas
Christmas v. Jackson
as 22-30273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rayshawn J. Christmas, also known as Rayshaun J. Christmas
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeff Jackson, Sergeant Reed, Captain Alma Burns and others
Seals v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00315
Petitioner:
Curtis Bernard Seals
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. TX Child Support Office
as 22-20185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters and Sealed Juvenile
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Child Support Office, Ken Paxton and State of Texas
Spikes v. Seals
as 2:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Defendant:
Randy Seals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Casby v. Rester
as 22-30107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrell T. Casby
Defendant / Appellee:
Justin Rester, Sergeant, Scott Williams, Master Sergeant, Jeremy Sistrunk, Lieutenant and others
WHITEHEAD v. GRAMMAR et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
RICKI LEA STEWART, JOHNATHAN RAMSEY, PEACHES RIDGEWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
