Cases 31 - 40 of 196
Imbraguglio v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Dominick Imbraguglio
Defendant:
Sec. James M. LeBlanc, Seth Smith, Warden Jerry Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOONE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05365
Plaintiff:
LAMOUNT BOONE
Defendant:
PA.DOC SEC. JOHN WETZEL, TAMMY FERGUSON and SCI-MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOBBLEN v. BRITTIAN et al
as 2:2021cv04726
Petitioner:
WILLIAM NOBBLEN
Respondent:
SUPT. KATHY BRITTIAN, SEC. JOHN WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
TRICE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00527
Respondent:
SEC. WETZEL, SUPT. CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
CEASAR TRICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TRICE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00439
Respondent:
SUPT. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, SGT WETZEL and others
Petitioner:
CEASAR TRICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2021cv00986
Defendant:
Downstate Correctional Facility, Lt. Kailvetti, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. SEC. FLA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
ROY OTIS FLOYD
Respondent:
SEC. FLA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
