Cases 31 - 40 of 50
SHALA v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2013cv00107
Petitioner:
SOKOL SHALA
Respondent:
JOHN TSOUKARIS and WINNIE CHEUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King v. Bosenko et al
as 2:2012cv02940
Plaintiff:
Jesse James King
Defendant:
Tom Bosenko , Dave Kent , Mike Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Allen, et al
as 12-1201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN D. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
N. ALLEN, C. FLORY, A. COSNER and others
Clay Caldwell v. Louis Folino, et al
as 12-1971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAY CALDWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent, M. A. PRICE, Lieutenant, GAGNON, Sgt. and others
Brooks v. Medina, et al
as 11-1549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH CLAYTON BROOKS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden, TRAVIS TRANNI, Warden, FRANCIS MASSENGILL, Associate Warden and others
Clay Caldwell v. Louis Folino, et al
as 11-3037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAY CALDWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, M. A. PRICE, GAGNON and others
Brooks v. Medina et al
as 1:2011cv01604
Plaintiff:
Keith Clayton Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Medina, Audet, Sokol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenner v. Sokol et al
as 1:2011cv01497
Plaintiff:
David K. Jenner
Defendant:
William Sokol, Amy (I) Cosner, Amy Cosner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonds v. Doe #1 et al
as 11-575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald Sonds
Defendant - Appellee:
Doe #1, Lieutenant, SHU, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, in his/her personal and official capacity, Doe #2, Correctional Officer, SHU, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, in his/her personal and official capacity, Doe #3, US Marshal, Federal Building, Syracuse, NY, in his/her personal and official capacity and others
Sonds v. Doe #1 et al
as 9:2010cv01130
Plaintiff:
Reginald Sonds
Defendant:
Doe #1, Doe #2, Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
