Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Sego v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv01991
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Sego
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv05406
Plaintiff:
Julian L. Davis
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Instrumentality Chicago Police Department, Michael Alaniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sego v. Ainly et al
as 3:2013cv08029
Defendant:
Unknown Ainly and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
God Kenneth Wayne Sego, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig Majors v. James Sego, et al
as 11-6334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG MAJORS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES SEGO, DAVID OSBORNE, RUBEN HODGE and others
Bean #253562 v. Tribley et al
as 2:2011cv00427
Plaintiff:
Rafeal Bean #253562
Defendant:
Ken Tribley, B. Mercier, Unknown Tallio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Harris v. John Adams, et al
as 11-2310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ADAMS, Lieutenant, ROBERT TENUTA, Sergeant, CHARLES SCOTT, Nurse and others
Defendant:
FERNANDO FRONTERA, Doctor
Majors v. Sego et al
as 3:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
Craig Majors
Defendant:
James Sego, David Osborne, Ruben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham #272603 v. Johns et al
as 2:2011cv00241
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
P. Johns, American Correctional Association, CMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Sego et al
as 3:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
Alfred Eugene Ward
Defendant:
Sego, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gresham v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 10-2539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as "Internal Affairs John Does, Jane Does", D. TASSON, Sergeant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
