Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Evchikov v. Sutterfield et al
as 4:2013cv02264
Plaintiff:
Sergei Evchikov
Defendant:
Scott Sutterfield and Matthew Lenze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novitskiy v. Holm
as 13-1044
Petitioner - Appellant:
SERGEY GENNAD'YEVICH NOVITSKIY
Respondent - Appellee:
MATT HOLM, Warden of I.C.E. Processing Center
Ludwig v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00225
Petitioner:
Sergei Paul Ludwig
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Novitskiy v. Warden of Aurora I.C.E. Processing Center et al
as 1:2012cv00965
Plaintiff:
Sergey Genad'yevi Novitskiy
Respondent:
Warden of Aurora I.C.E. Processing Center, Matt Holm, Carl Zabat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gudoshnikov v. Napolitano et al
as 5:2011cv00958
Petitioner:
Sergey Gudoshnikov
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano, Eric Holder, Nuria T Prendes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson #210442 v. Caspar
as 2:2011cv00272
Plaintiff:
Louis David Johnson #210442, Jr.
Defendant:
Sergei Caspar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sergey Andreyev v. Brian Kjorlie, et al
as 11-1111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SERGEY V. ANDREYEV
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN KJORLIE, ROBERT KIEFER, MATTHEW EARLL and others
Sergey Proshak v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 2:2010cv07197
Petitioner:
Sergey Proshak
Respondent:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Shishkin v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv04201
Petitioner:
Sergey Shishkin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA, et al v. Atty Gen USA
as 09-4669
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SERGEY ZHELYATDINOV
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
