Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Mills v. USA
as 5:2012cv00422
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Mills, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Censke #10929-040 (Formerly MDOC #484602) v. Marquette, County of, et al
as 2:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Censke #10929-040 (Formerly MDOC #484602)
Defendant:
Marquette, County of, Michael Lovelace, Cheryl Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gooden vs. Thaler
as 4:2010cv00211
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Gooden, Sr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Censke #10929-040 (Formerly MDOC #484602) v. Ekdahl et al
as 2:2008cv00283
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Censke #10929-040 (Formerly MDOC #484602)
Defendant:
Unknown Ekdahl, Unknown McQuiggin, Unknown Toibley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Censke #10929-040 (Formerly MDOC #484602) v. Lauren et al
as 2:2008cv00269
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Censke #10929-040 (Formerly MDOC #484602)
Defendant:
Art Lauren, Marquette, County of, Baraga, County of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wesley v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv07132
Plaintiff:
Michael Donnel Wesley
Defendant:
City of New York, Canino, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Censke #484602 v. Tribley et al
as 2:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Censke #484602
Defendant:
Linda Tribley, Unknown McQuiggin, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Censke #484602 v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Censke #484602
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Censke #484602 v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00691
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Censke #484602
Defendant:
Willie O. Smith, Unknown Norwood, Erica Huss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis v. United States of America
as 7:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Hollis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
