Cases 31 - 40 of 300
Fanter v. State of TN
as 3:2023cv01080
Petitioner:
Steven Joseph Fanter
Respondent:
State of TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Andy Ortiz
Respondent:
BM. Zborovancik, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. SCDC at 1045 Mullins St Rd Memphis TN 38134 et al
as 2:2023cv02608
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Vaughn
Defendant:
SCDC at 1045 Mullins St Rd Memphis TN 38134, Ofc. Smith, Ofc. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burt v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Amy Burt
Defendant:
Jim Hammond and Hamilton County, TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settles, et al
as 23-5731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant / Appellee:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andy Ortiz
Defendant:
BM. Zborovancik, John Doe, Dan Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIBSCHAW v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv02987
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRIBSCHAW
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, TAMMY FERGUSON, ANN VERYYALA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheets v. Cumberland County TN Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Shawn Sheets
Defendant:
Cumberland County TN Jail and Fast Pace Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Matheney
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Chardon Bennett
Defendant:
Warren County TN Court
Respondent:
Jackie Matheney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
