Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Burgess v. F.B.O.P. et al
as 2:2013cv02007
Plaintiff:
Corey Burgess
Defendant:
FBOP, Department of Justice, DSCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muse v. USP Atwater, CA Staff Members
as 6:2012cv03558
Plaintiff:
Earl Muse
Defendant:
USP Atwater, CA Staff Members
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Burgess v. F.B.O.P. et al
as 1:2012cv01817
Plaintiff:
Corey Burgess
Defendant:
F.B.O.P. , Department of Justice , DSCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00779
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Defendant:
United States of America, USP Atwater, J. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Way v. 20 Unknown Employees of Federal Bureau of Prisons USP-Atwater, California
as 1:2012cv00357
Plaintiff:
Long Way
Defendant:
20 Unknown Employees of Federal Bureau of Prisons USP-Atwater, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00001
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Defendant:
United States of America, USP Atwater, J. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jermaine Armstrong v. Warden of USP-Atwater
as 11-16879
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERMAINE ANTONIO ARMSTRONG
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF USP-ATWATER
Tony Alexander v. D. Lorance, et al
as 11-16393
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY B. ALEXANDER
Respondent - Appellee:
D. LORANCE, DHO, Western Regional Office, STOKES, SOS, USP Atwater, DAVENPORT, SOS, USP Atwater and others
Armstrong v. Drew
as 1:2010cv00173
Petitioner:
Jermaine Antonio Armstrong
Respondent:
Warden of USP-Atwater, Warden of USP-Atwater and Warden of USP-Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Blow v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv01684
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Raymond Blow
Defendant:
Dennis Smith and USP Atwater Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
