Cases 31 - 40 of 866
Farrell Cross v. Eileen Ramey
as 23-2571
Petitioner / Appellant:
Farrell Wayne Cross
Respondent / Appellee:
Eileen Ramey
Herrington v. El Paso County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Defendant:
El Paso County Sheriff Office, Chad Miller, U.S. District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Abbott
as 23-10400
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Don Ameche Levern Wright
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregory Wayne Abbott, Cecelia Phalen Abbott, Farrel Chapman, Public Administrator and others
David Farrell v. United States
as 23-1789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Farrell
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Willis v. Lumpkin
as 23-40229
Petitioner / Appellant:
Leonard Farrell Willis
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
MORRIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO MORRIS, JR.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WARDEN MICHELE FARRELL, WARDEN NANCY GIANETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v Blitz et al
as 4:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Ira B. Harris
Defendant:
Robert D. Blitz and Kelly Farrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Abbott et al
as 3:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Don Ameche Levern Wright
Defendant:
Gregory Wayne Abbott, Cecilia Phalen Abbott, Farrel Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Farrell v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Chad M Farrell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAMBERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
EBONY CHAMBERS and ROBERT TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
