Cases 41 - 50 of 3,467
Ortiz v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Brandi-Lyn Ortiz
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman, Dawn Noggle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Figueroa v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Luis Ortiz Figueroa
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stewart v. United States of Corp et al
as 1:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Brittnay Stewart
Defendant:
United States of Corp, Thor Martin, William Gamboney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpo-Brown v. FNU et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Defendant:
Gunther FNU, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Officer Ortiz
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Lewis Earl Perkins
Defendant:
Officer Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Aron Ortiz
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Koch v. Lorain County, Ohio, et al.
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Charles Koch
Defendant:
Lorain County, Ohio, Lorain Board of County Commissioners, Sheriff Phillip R. Stammitti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ortiz et al. v. City of Youngstown et al.
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Gierbonlini Ortiz and Wanda Diaz
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, Tyl Srbinovich and Ivan Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz v. Alba et al
as 5:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Ortiz
Defendant:
FNU Alba, FNU Ozokpor, FNU Reins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
