Cases 41 - 50 of 618
Michael Boyles v. Troy Bowser
as 22-35313
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE BOYLES
Respondent / Appellee:
TROY BOWSER, Warden
BOYLE v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv01331
Petitioner:
RICHARD BOYLE
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
El v. City of Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Bakha Yawuti El
Defendant:
City of Myrtle Beach, City of Myrtle Beach Police Department, David Giosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAWSON v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAWSON
Defendant:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, DONALD HICKS, RAYNARD T. FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El v. City of Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Bakha Yawuti El
Defendant:
City of Myrtle Beach, City of Myrtle Beach Police Department, David Giosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Edge
as 22-10302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Jamal White
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Edge, John Boyle, Kevin Strength and others
Wachter v. Meyers et al
as 3:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Marc Wachter
Defendant:
Dr. Meyers, Jane Doe 1, Lieutenant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Boyle
as 5:2022ct03090
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILDS v. FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
DONTAY WILDS
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL, RON FREEMAN, CORRECT CARE SOLITIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Clarence R. Williamson, III and Mark Howard
Defendant:
Scott Thompson, Daniel Monti, Cassandra Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
