Cases 41 - 50 of 15,154
Mercer v. New York City Police Dept. - 47 Precinct et al
as 1:2024cv02803
Plaintiff:
Ira Mercer
Defendant:
New York City Police Dept. - 47 Precinct, Detective Christopher Sally, Darcel Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mercer v. New York City Police Dept. 47 Precint et al
as 1:2024cv02827
Plaintiff:
Ira Mercer
Defendant:
New York City Police Dept. 47 Precint, Detective Christopher Sally, Officer Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00645
Petitioner:
Robert Vincent Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Simpson v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-6338
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BARTHOLOMEW SIMPSON
Defendant:
GLENN YOUNGKIN, ROBERT MOSIER, JASON S. MIYARES and others
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-5044
Plaintiff:
DAVID GEORGE CLARK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, KEVIN STITT, Governor, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director and others
Clark v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Orlandus Clark
Defendant:
L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and FNU George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clark v. Withers et al
as 6:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Warden Shannon Withers and George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Reginald Lee Clark
Respondent:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
