Cases 41 - 50 of 322
Curley v. Martinez et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Tony Curley
Defendant:
Teresa S Martinez, James L Sutton, Justine D Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorski v. Matevousian et al
as 0:2022cv02123
Plaintiff:
Krissy Ann Gorski
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Dr. Reyna, T. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. Matevousian et al
as 0:2022cv02122
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Dr. Reyna, T. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Starr et al
as 0:2022cv02030
Plaintiff:
Lakisha S Smith
Defendant:
Mistelle Starr, Dr. Reyna, Mr. McIntosh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyna v. Willis et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Reyna and Christopher Lee Reyna
Defendant:
Julian Dominguez, Richard Willis, Mary Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez Reyna v. Pride
as 7:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Adelmo Ely Gonzalez Reyna
Defendant:
V. Pride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyna v. Border Patrol Officer Mathews
as 2:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Javier Reyna
Defendant:
Border Patrol Officer Mathews, Collis White, Tara Zenner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Nelson
as 22-50313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kerwin Bryant
Defendant / Appellee:
C. Nelson, Detective, #2072, San Antonio Police Department, S. Johnson, Sergeant, #3145, San Antonio Police Department, R. Valadez, Detective, #2101, San Antonio Police Department Task Force and others
Gonzalez Reyna v. Pride
as 1:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Adelmo Ely Gonzalez Reyna
Defendant:
V. Pride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv10631
Plaintiff:
Benjamen Hill
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Kyle Echler, Jennifer Hern and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
