Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Charles Horton v. Nicholas Degennaro, et al
as 14-10796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS DEGENNARO, AFT Agent, CHARLES SEDBERRY, AFT Agent, DAVID BENEFIELD, Cherokee Gunn/Pawn and others
Dodson v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Dennis D Dodson, Jr
Defendant:
Menard Correctional Center, C/O Barfield, C/O Benefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Degennaro et al
as 1:2013cv03869
Plaintiff:
Charles Horton
Defendant:
Nicholas Degennaro, Charles Sedberry, David Benefield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matthews v. Davis et al
as 3:2013cv01072
Plaintiff:
Zanthe Matthews
Defendant:
Randy Davis, Jr, J O'Neal, Charles W Peck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Benefield et al
as 1:2013cv03206
Plaintiff:
Georgette Benita Thornton
Defendant:
Deborah C. Benefield, Benham and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benefield v. Perritt
as 5:2013hc02158
Petitioner:
James E. Benefield
Respondent:
Brad Perritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Canady v. Williams et al
as 3:2013de00028
Plaintiff:
Frederick Canady
Defendant:
FNU Williams and FNU Benefield
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Benefield v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv02693
Plaintiff:
Kacy Kinard Benefield
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Tara Diaz, Chris Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ozzie Pickett v. Daniel Monti, et al
as 12-3627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OZZIE PICKETT
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL MONTI, Major, HOMER MARKEL, Major, JOSE DELGADO, Lieutenant and others
Warren v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv02680
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Warren
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Joyce Zoldak, William G Stewart, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
