Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Brumfield v. Bently et al
as 5:2014cv00365
Petitioner:
George A Brumfield
Respondent:
Robert Bently, Kim Thomas and Mark Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. Price et al
as 2:2014cv00232
Plaintiff:
Chalmus Wright
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas and Robert Bently
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRYON v. CFCF - PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2014cv00645
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SCOTT TRYON
Defendant:
CFCF - PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and SGT. BENTLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Adam Castro v. G. J. Janda et al
as 3:2013cv02750
Plaintiff:
Jacob Adam Castro
Defendant:
G J Janda, Bently, Grey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Adam Castro v. G. J. Janda et al
as 2:2013cv07849
Defendant:
Bently, Cones, Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Adam Castro
Wood v. King County Jail Health Services et al
as 2:2013cv01752
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Wood
Defendant:
King County Jail Health Services, King County Correctional Facility, Richard Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metcalf v. De Los Santos et al
as 3:2012cv01815
Plaintiff:
John Bently Metcalf
Defendant:
Ricardo De Los Santos, Guinn Justice Center and La Salle Southwest Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. HENSON et al
as 2:2012cv00438
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE ROGERS
Defendant:
JOHN BENTLY HENSON and CITY OF PGH POLICE DEPT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen Lino v. J. Kellerman, et al
as 11-57193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWEN LINO
Defendant - Appellee:
J. KELLERMAN, Facility Captain, J. T. OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, G. J. JANDA, Associate Warden and others
Owen Lino v. J. Kellerman, et al
as 11-57092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWEN LINO
Defendant - Appellee:
J. KELLERMAN, Facility Captain, J. T. OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, G. J. JANDA, Associate Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
