Cases 41 - 50 of 77
SIRLEAF v. ARMOR HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02524
Defendant:
ARMOR HEALTH SERVICES, INC., SHAW, LYNDA BURROWS and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. SCHIFF et al
as 1:2019cv02523
Defendant:
ROD ROSENSTEIN, LYNDA BURROWS, ANDREW MCCABE and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. NYC Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv05320
Plaintiff:
Michael McKinney
Defendant:
NYC Department of Corrections, Manhattan Detention Center, N.Y.C. Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corwell v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2019cv03049
Plaintiff:
Ziare Corwell
Defendant:
LaFonda Spaulding, John Does 1-7 and Westchester County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stompingbear v. Reed et al
as 6:2018cv06114
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Defendant:
John Does, 2-4, Larry Reed, Co. Pritchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. The City of Yonkers et al
as 1:2018cv03951
Plaintiff:
Santiago Gomez
Defendant:
The City of Yonkers, Samoyedny, Minichino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradfield v. Core Civic, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Bradfield
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc, Kimberly Allen, FNU Tyus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs v. Goord et al
as 9:2017cv00736
Plaintiff:
Martin Diggs
Defendant:
Glenn S. Goord, Joseph Bellnier, M. Guynup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galeas v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2017ct03108
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, NC Department of Public Safety and John Doe 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeas v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2017ct03085
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, NC DPS Prisons, NC Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
