Cases 41 - 50 of 642
Stinson et al v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Cyanco Nicholi Stinson, Samuel Vinnie, Raheem Reason and others
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail and Employees of Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Alvarez
as 23-10685
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Fernando Fabian Alvarez
JONES v. FABIAN et al
as 1:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Defendant:
FABIAN and FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marrufo v. Harpe
as 5:2023cv00313
Petitioner:
Fabian Arturo Marrufo
Respondent:
Steve Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Fabian v. Warden, MDC Guaynabo
as 8:2023cv00650
Petitioner:
Richard Fabian
Respondent:
MDC Guaynabo and Warden, MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Parrales-Mero v. Warden at FCI Mendota
as 1:2023cv00339
Petitioner:
Ronald Fabian Parrales-Mero
Respondent:
Warden at FCI Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
CRAVENER v. MCCLISTER et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. CRAVENER, SR.
Defendant:
JUDGE CHASE MCCLISTER, ASST DISTRICT ATTORN REBECCA LOZZI, WARDEN JESSICA HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perpall v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv20590
Plaintiff:
Fabian Perpall
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Michael Ronier Little v. A. Valli et al
as 5:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Michael Ronier Little
Defendant:
A. Valli, E. Velez, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Fabian Garcia Ramos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
