Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Wiley v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv02708
Petitioner:
Frank James Wiley
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. United States of America
as 8:2008cv01039
Plaintiff:
Frank James Miller
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Pizzo v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2007cv01980
Petitioner:
Frank James Pizzo
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawthorne #255145 v. Howes
as 1:2007cv00287
Petitioner:
Frank James Hawthorne #255145
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2007cv00171
Plaintiff:
Frank James Edwards
Defendant:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burnett v. City of Inman
as 5:2007cv03040
Plaintiff:
Frank James Burnett
Defendant:
City of Inman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Inman Police Department, City of
as 5:2007cv03039
Plaintiff:
Frank James Burnett
Defendant:
Inman Police Department, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Hogue
as 5:2007cv03041
Plaintiff:
Frank James Burnett
Defendant:
James Hogue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. McPherson County Sheriff's Department
as 5:2007cv03038
Plaintiff:
Frank James Burnett
Defendant:
McPherson County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Inman, City of
as 4:2007cv00098
Plaintiff:
Frank James Burnett
Defendant:
Inman, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
