Cases 41 - 50 of 722
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03277
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, CENTURY REGIONAL DET FACILITY, ANGELA D. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dayberry v. Long et al
as 4:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Jim Wayne Dayberry
Defendant:
Brandon Long, Jennifer Osborne, Justin Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI and LALA MAHA MOQADDEM (REGRAGUI)
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, SHERRI BLUEBOND, PATRICIA GUERRERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Palomar v. Newsom et al
as 2:2023cv02329
Plaintiff:
George Ruiz Palomar, II
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Darrell Rowen, Rachel Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnell G. Haddock v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2023cv08679
Plaintiff:
Donnell G. Haddock and Danisha Elkins
Defendant:
Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Tim Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2023cv01346
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steven Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gavin v. USA
as 7:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
James Patrick Gavin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2023cv01275
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Jordan Powell and Keith Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2023cv04837
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Foster
Defendant:
Marisa Ramirez, Joseph Jimenez, Christopher Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Young et al
as 7:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
James Mickey Young, Keith Cox, Jordan Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
