Cases 41 - 50 of 424
Hightower, Jr. v. DeLoach et al
as 3:2022cv00815
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Hightower, Jr.
Defendant:
H. D. DeLoach, Putnam County Jail, Medical Company Putnam County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hightower v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv14256
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Elijah Hightower
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Slave-Noose et al
as 3:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Defendant:
Slave-Noose, J Claudid-Bil, Lance White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hightower v. Daniels et al
as 3:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Hightower, Jr.
Defendant:
Nancy Daniels, Matthew Metz, Boss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAINE v. STRONG et al
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BLAINE
Defendant:
KATHLEEN STRONG, SHANTAY D HIGHTOWER and LEWIS LAMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hightower v. Dunbar
as 4:2022cv01380
Petitioner:
David Hightower
Respondent:
Warden R. S. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hightower v. Petty et al
as 1:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
JaPrince Hightower
Defendant:
Seth Petty, Esmeralda Chene and John Doe 1:22-cv-47
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNELL v. PADGETT et al
as 4:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
LARRY GENE CONNELL
Defendant:
WAYNE PADGETT, HIGHTOWER, FORD JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hightower v. Buckner
as 4:2022cv00265
Petitioner:
Jeremy Hightower
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hightower v. Buckner
as 4:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
Jeremy Hightower
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
