Cases 41 - 50 of 1,224
Kelley v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Kelley, George Isbill, Rocky Ward and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
MARTEZ BROWN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB, JAY HENDRIX, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benn v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Jeff Benn
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Jack Hendrix, Patrick Krugar and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix #351561 v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Tahj Quentin Hendrix
Defendant:
Siji Thomas, Grace Adams, Ryan Thornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. HENDRIX
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
ALFRED D. TURNER
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEITH v. IN DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv01334
Plaintiff:
REESE KEITH
Defendant:
IN DEPT. OF CORRECTION, JACK HENDRIX and WILLIAM WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00322
Petitioner:
Jimmy Glenn Hendrix
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Cortez et al
as 4:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Randy Simmons
Defendant:
Joaquin Cortez, Judge Russell Cavendar, Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRATER v. HENDRIX
as 3:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRATER
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00976
Petitioner:
Rosendo Garcia Navarro
Respondent:
Warden DeWayne Hendrix and Warden Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
