Cases 41 - 50 of 487
Bell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Joel Bell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Loy v. Greg Scott, et al
as 23-1278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN LOY
Defendant / Appellee:
GREG SCOTT, SHARON COLEMAN WEEMS, JUAN PEREZ and others
Phillips v. Jusino
as 3:2022cv02792
Petitioner:
Lois Latrilla Phillips
Respondent:
Warden T. Jusino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hagos v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2022cv01609
Petitioner:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Respondent:
State of Washington, Lois Trickey and King County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. Dodd et al
as 3:2022cv03234
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Perkins
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and W Loy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seybold v. Huddleston et al
as 1:2022cv01377
Plaintiff:
Josephus Seybold
Defendant:
Britney Huddleston, Kacy Redman, Rachel Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Isom D Rogers, III
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Petitioner:
Antoine Jackson, DeMariol Byrd, Donte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WOLF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. A. SANTOS and others
Debtor / Appellee:
MINDY ANDRETTI
Phillips v. Jusino
as 5:2022cv05220
Petitioner:
Lois Latrilla Phillips
Respondent:
Warden T. Jusino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
