Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 182
Ridge v. Havas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv08958
Defendant: Howard Block, Esq., Joel Proyect, Edward C. Bruno, Esq. and others
Plaintiff: Melbourne Ridge, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davismoore v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01468
Plaintiff: Sean Davismoore
Defendant: Brigham Sloan, J. King and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Sloan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01364
Plaintiff: Stacey R. Long
Defendant: Brigham Sloan, J. King and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devore v. Mohr et al
as 2:2018cv00559
Plaintiff: James P. Devore
Defendant: Gary C. Mohr, Michael Davis, Clark Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018hc02143
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241
Michael Davis v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 18-30660
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee: DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Ritter et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv01072
Plaintiff: Franklin Ritter, Stacey R. Long, Sean A. Davismoore and others
Defendant: Michael Davis, PhD., Brigham Sloan and J. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritter v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00826
Plaintiff: Franklin Ritter
Defendant: Michael Davis, Brigham Sloan and J. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff v. Eppinger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00671
Plaintiff: John Thomas Goff
Defendant: LaShaunn Eppinger, Ronald Armbruster, Ronald Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2018cv00007
Petitioner: Michael Davis
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?