Cases 41 - 50 of 151
Brown v. Aderman et al
as 2:2018cv01937
Defendant:
Officer Aderman, ICE Staff, Sgt Schloegl and others
Plaintiff:
Leetang Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Mailroom Staff et al
as 2:2018cv02258
Plaintiff:
Steven Robert Cooper
Defendant:
Nurse and Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thiele v. Busby et al
as 3:2018cv00186
Defendant:
Moore, Helms, Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Thiele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevie Stevenson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 18-56016
Petitioner:
STEVIE J. STEVENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of CDCR, SCOTT KERNAN, Undersecretary/Secretary of CDCR, SHANNON SWAIN, Acting Superintendent of Education and others
Tommy Keeton v. D. Seitz, et al
as 18-55793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY ROY KEETON
Defendant - Appellee:
D. SEITZ, In his individual capacity, Mailroom Supervisor, K. BELTRAN, In his individual capacity, Mailroom Supervisor, B. HARRIS, In his individual capacity, Appeals Coordinator and others
Roudabush v. Hollembaek et al
as 5:2018ct03104
Plaintiff:
James L. Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant:
S. Hollembaek, S. Butler, Lt. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Suber v. Snohomish County Corrections Mailroom Staff et al
as 2:2018cv00428
Plaintiff:
James Suber
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Moyer et al
as 1:2018cv00363
Plaintiff:
Scotland Williams
Defendant:
Stephen Moyer, Dayena Corcoran, Frank Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royal v. Scott et al
as 3:2017cv01453
Plaintiff:
Marcus Royal
Defendant:
Gov. Rick Scott, Julie Jones and Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Scott et al
as 3:2017cv01454
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cooper
Defendant:
Rick Scott and Mailroom Staff Employees RMC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
