Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Brooks v. Bufford et al
as 2:2010cv00689
Plaintiff:
Bevan Xavier Brooks
Defendant:
Curtis L Bufford , Michael Higgins , Timothy Lepet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Allen Correctional Center
as 2:2010cv00306
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Warden Allen Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thurston v. Lappin et al
as 2:2009cv00177
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr.
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00659
Plaintiff:
Walter Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurston, Jr. v. Hickey et al
as 2:2009cv00046
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr.
Respondent:
Deborah A. Hickey and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thurston v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv00008
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr.
Respondent:
The United States of America and Federal Correctional Institution - Jesup
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniels v. Richardson et al
as 2:2008cv02268
Plaintiff:
Daisy Daniels
Defendant:
Andra Richardson, Joe Arpaio and Nathaniel Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thurston v. The United States
as 2:2008cv00138
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr.
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Bryant
as 3:2008cv00568
Petitioner:
Walter Nathaniel Smith
Respondent:
Randall Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State Of Florida et al
as 3:2008cv00554
Petitioner:
Walter Nathaniel Smith
Respondent:
State Of Florida and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
