Cases 41 - 50 of 341
Owens v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
Berques Rashad Owens
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree and Aaron Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Albemarle District Jail et al
as 5:2021ct03140
Defendant:
Captain Cox, Lieutenant Sharpe, Sergeant Grace Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyrone Brown and Hunter Sean Kleintank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. A. Robinson
as 21-6688
Defendant / Appellee:
WAUMMADI, MICHELLE WALKER, Counselor, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Roundtree v. United States of America
as 8:2021cv00955
Plaintiff:
Ashanti Roundtree
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES et al v. WILLISTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00070
Defendant:
MATTHEW FORTNEY, JOHN SALMEIER, MARQUIS WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL JONES and SHERVONTAY ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHERVONTAY ROUNDTREE v. SCOTT TUMMOND et al
as 1:2021cv00069
Defendant:
BRETT BOYCE, LEVY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ZACKARY HINKOFER and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL JONES and SHERVONTAY ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00202
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canady v. Herring et al
as 5:2021ct03026
Defendant:
John Gray, Mark D. Fleming, Reggielette Roundtree Coley and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Canady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Perry et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Officer Mr. Lockhart, Ofc. Ms. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folks v. Ellison
as 1:2021cv00105
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Richmond County, Aiken County E.M.S. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerrald Anthony Folks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
