Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 21,865
Schurman v. Luke et al
as 4:2024cv04113
Petitioner: Stephanie Amanda Schurman
Respondent: Steven Luke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schurman v Luke et al
as 4:2024cv04114
Petitioner: Stephanie Amanda Schurman
Defendant: Steven Luke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ewing v. Back et al
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff: Steven Guy Ewing
Defendant: J. Back and Tammy W. Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00752
Petitioner: Leonard T Holmes
Respondent: Warden Steven R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vega v. Cushing et al
as 2:2024cv00749
Plaintiff: Alfredo Vega
Defendant: Capt Daniel Cushing, Capt Michael Cole, Lt Anthony Matushak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff: Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant: Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jolley v. Kemp
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Steven Jolley
Defendant: Jesse Kemp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Steinpreis v. Michael Meisner
as 24-2024
Petitioner: STEVEN MICHAEL STEINPREIS
Respondent: MICHAEL MEISNER
Rehart v. TDCJ
as 24-10354
Plaintiff: Steven G. Rehart
Defendant: TDCJ, Danny C. Diaz, Cellmate at TDCJ, OIfficer FNU Blackshire, Officer at TDCJ and others
Crump v. Vital Core Health Strategies, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv03098
Plaintiff: Steven Crump
Defendant: Vital Core Health Strategies, LLC, Calvin Hayden, (fnu) Ehrlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?