Cases 41 - 50 of 935
Sawyer v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Matthew Caleb Sawyer
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Director Dept of Corrections, Medical Director of Elayn Hunt Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boatman v. Porter et al
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman and Lavon Lee Boatman
Defendant:
Elizabeth Porter, Jon P. Carner, Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tonnie Nealy v. Jon Carner, et al
as 23-11172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONNIE NEALY
Defendant / Appellee:
JON CARNER and DONALD SAWYER
Fitch v. USA
as 23-40131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, Christopher Wray and others
Brown v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Brown
Defendant:
Acting Warden Trent Allen, Laura Eldridge, Dr. D. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Sawyer et al
as 7:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jorge Cruz
Defendant:
Thomas Sawyer, Michael Lovelace and Gary Hodnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Ontaneda et al
as 6:2023cv06077
Plaintiff:
Tyrieke J. Bradley
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Ontaneda, Superintendent Burnett, CO Taddeo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. Peterson et al
as 2:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Troy Wagner
Defendant:
Kanisha Peterson, Dakota Cardenas, Mark Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roscoe v. Sawyers
as 7:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Emmitt G. Roscoe
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Sawyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gummow v. Monyelle et al
as 3:2022cv50433
Plaintiff:
Bradley Frederick Gummow
Defendant:
Cameron Monyelle, Sawyer Kurth, James Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
