Cases 41 - 50 of 685
ELLIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv02836
Plaintiff:
PRISCILLA ELLIS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, EUEREH COLTRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brincefield v. Barnes et al
as 4:2022cv03024
Petitioner:
Thomas Lee Brincefield
Respondent:
Nanette Barnes and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gilberto Castro Ordinola v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 5:2022cv01518
Petitioner:
Gilberto Castro Ordinola
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, J. Doerer and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Campbell v. U.S. Attorney General
as 3:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Harrington Campbell
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-13031
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Jean Oscar v. USA, et al
as 22-12481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN EROLE OSCAR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. GOVERNMENT and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-12811
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Norman v. U.S. Attorney General
as 22-50675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Norman
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Attorney General, for the Western District of Texas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5634
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
