Cases 41 - 50 of 1,251
Vargas v. Christensen
as 1:2024cv00302
Petitioner:
Juan Benjamin Vargas
Respondent:
Warden D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VARGAS v. MCCAULEY
as 2:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
ANGEL TERRELL VARGAS, JR.
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. MCCAULEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tan v. Yuba County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Tan
Defendant:
Yuba County Jail, Wendell Anderson, Nick Morawczski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
STACY SMITH
Defendant:
LISA ARMSTRONG, OFFICER COUCH, MEGAN OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tan v. Yuba County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Tan
Defendant:
Yuba County Jail, Wendell Anderson, Nick Morawczsici and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ramos-Vargas v. Huntingdon Prison Administration
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Ramos-Vargas
Defendant:
Huntingdon Prison Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dickson et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Juston Shaw
Defendant:
Brent Dickson, Sgt. Vargas, Sgt. Mott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Martinez et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Roberto Vargas
Respondent:
Ronald Martinez and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMOS-VARGAS v. HUNTINGDON PRISON ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RAMOS-VARGAS
Defendant:
HUNTINGDON PRISON ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Bennett v. Newsom et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Hambun, Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
