Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Miller v. Board and Directors of Coalinga State Hospital, et al
as 1:2014cv00731
Petitioner:
Bruce Wayne Miller
Respondent:
Board and Directors of Coalinga State Hospital and Department of State Hospitals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Board and Directors of Coalinga State Hospital et al
as 3:2014cv02077
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wayne Miller
Defendant:
Board and Directors of Coalinga State Hospital and Department of State Hospitals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Koll
as 1:2014cv00661
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wayne Miller
Defendant:
Luke Koll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Hooker et al
as 2:2013cv06795
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wayne Miller
Defendant:
Suzanne Jolissaint, David Dalton, Jordan Burst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Wong
as 4:2013cv04780
Petitioner:
Bruce Wayne Miller
Respondent:
Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. USA
as 3:2013cv00477
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Russell Wayne Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Miller v. The Superior Court et al
as 5:2013cv03638
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wayne Miller
Defendant:
The Superior Court, Directors of the City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. The Superior Court et al
as 1:2013cv01163
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wayne Miller
Defendant:
The Superior Court, Directors of the City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Board of Directors of the City and County of San Francisco CA
as 3:2013cv03466
Petitioner:
Bruce Wayne Miller
Respondent:
Board of Directors of the City and County of San Francisco CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Miller v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-40950
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES WAYNE MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.