Cases 51 - 60 of 107
ALLEN v. STATE OF NEVADA
as 1:2013cv00584
Petitioner:
GENE ANTHONY ALLEN
Respondent:
STATE OF NEVADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HALL v. HONNEN et al.
as 5:2013cv00087
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ALLEN HALL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HONNEN, CINDY SWIER and MICHAEL CREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. White
as 1:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Beverly White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Allen v. Lamas, et al
as 13-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
LAMAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and BLAIR COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
ALLEN v. BROWN et al
as 2:2012cv00321
Petitioner:
MARIO ANTHONY ALLEN
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. BROWN
as 2:2012cv00266
Petitioner:
MARIO ANTHONY ALLEN
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. The State of Nevada
as 1:2012cv06738
Plaintiff:
Gene Anthony Allen
Defendant:
The State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mack v. Falk, et al
as 12-1303
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY ALLEN MACK
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES FALK, Warden, Sterling Correctional Facility, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Charles Allen, Sr. v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-10541
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES ANTHONY ALLEN, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Feldon Bush, Sr. v. Edward Rendell
as 12-2221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELDON BUSH, SR., JAMES HILL and ANTHONY ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAMAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
