Cases 51 - 60 of 107
Morgan v. Semple et al
as 3:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Morgan, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott S. Semple, Monica Rinaldi, Angel A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carolina v. Golas et al
as 3:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Douglas Carolina
Defendant:
Golas, Gillette, Nement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shehan v. Erfe et al
as 3:2015cv01315
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Shehan
Defendant:
Erfe, Marten, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Farrell et al
as 9:2015cv00892
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell
Defendant:
Timothy Farrell, Hitzman, Tulip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. Conger et al
as 5:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael Mendoza
Defendant:
Terry Conger, George Richmond and Susan Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavarria v. Conger et al
as 1:2014cv10152
Plaintiff:
Rickey Felix Chavarria
Defendant:
Hilton J. Conger, City of Smithville, Tennessee, Bratten Cook 2nd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Brinkman v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-16000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT L. BRINKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of Corrections, Central Office, MIKE LINDERMAN, Central Office, UNKNOWN CREDIO, named as Credio, Warden at Eyman, Florence and others
Savoie v. Palm Beach County Sheriff Bradshaw et al
as 9:2013cv80348
Plaintiff:
Roswitha A Savoie
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Sheriff Bradshaw, Artola, Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hans Reiser v. William Du Bois, et al
as 13-15694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HANS REISER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM H. DU BOIS, ROBERT NAVARRO, RICHARD E. JAMAR and others
PITTS v. BAGLEY et al
as 4:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WASHINGTON PITTS
Defendant:
MARGRET BAGLEY, BOB SANDWICH, GREY CONGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
